The Harvard College Democrats
(shield)
(shield)

17739
DOORS

1732
CALLS

User login

Syndicate

Syndicate content

disagreement

Competing Electoral Maps

Posted on Sun, 07/27/2008 - 9:33pm by Jarret Zafran

Usually, if I want to check the status of the very nitty gritty horse race aspects of the elections, I consult three sources: RealClearPolitics, Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball, and the Cook Political Report. I feel that between the three of them I get a good sense of the lay of the land.

All three have slightly different electoral maps, but I noticed that Cook is definitely a bit too pro-McCain and RealClearPolitics is a bit too pro-Obama. Sabato, who lies somewhere in between seems to me the most accurate.

The Cook Report has McCain leading 240-219 electoral votes with 79 electoral votes. It lists Virginia, Missouri, North Carolina, and Florida as leaning McCain (in the same category as Arkansas?). Never mind that most polls show a dead even race in most of them

It also lists Oregon, New Mexico, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, and Minnesota as all leaning towards Obama. This would be fair except that Oregon and Minnesota (without Pawlenty) are much safer for Obama than the other three, all of which should be considered toss ups (although again with NM and WI more likely to fall Obama's way than NH). Cook also lists Iowa as a toss up except that every major poll taken in Iowa has Obama ahead of McCain, the most recent by 10 points.

I understand polls aren't anything, but compare Cook's map to that of RCP and Larry Sabato.

RealClearPolitics has Obama ahead 238 to 163. Among the toss ups it lists are Indiana (Cook said likely R), and Missouri, Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida (all lean R for Cook). It also says TX is only leaning McCain. If Obama is truly competitive (even competitive) in Texas as we get close to the election, we can expect a landslide. It should be solid McCain territory. It seems to me unrealistic to categorize IN as a toss-up (without Bayh). It's not unwinnable, but it doesn't deserve to be in the same category as Virginia, a true toss up. Also, at this point, it might still be fairer to keep NC and MO in the lean category, despite the polls I cited above. FL is definitely a toss-up.

Sabato seems the fairest. He has Obama ahead 200 to 174 with 99 toss-up EVs. I do have a few gripes though. I don't think Indiana is as solid as he claims and should only be a likely McCain victory. I also think Florida should remain a tossup (like VA) for the time being. He has NC and MO as leaning Republican, which is fair, but lists Wisconsin as a tossup, which I think should be leaning toward Obama (like NM and IA).

So basically, the map as I see it is Obama 243 to McCain 200 with 95 tossup EVs, with the breakdown as follows.

Solid Obama: WA, CA, MD, DC, NJ, NY, CT, RI, MA, VT, DE
Likely Obama: OR, ME, MN
Lean Obama: WI, IA, NM, PA
Tossup: NV, CO, MI, OH, VA, FL, NH
Lean McCain: AK, MO, IN, NC
Likely McCain: MT, ND, MS, GA, AZ
Solid McCain: ID, UT, KS, NE, SD, OK, TX, AR, LA, AL, SC, TN, KY, WV

Finally, despite a lot of media coverage that made it seem like Obama lost ground in the past couple of weeks (prior to his trip), I'd just like to point out that there has not been a single national poll taken since the beginning of May that has McCain ahead of Obama.

So yeah, I'm still pretty optimistic.

Syndicate content