
SO -- I've been out of touch the past few days. I left Friday to spend the weekend in sun-streaked Somerset, Mass. with the girlfriend's family, watching pro sports and eating delicious homemade meatloaf1. Vaguely I heard, through the meatloaf haze, that Congress had reversed itself on the "bailout" for reasons I still haven't quite wrapped my head around. I gather they involved "sweeteners."2 Anyway, I completely missed the Vote that Cured Wall Street and Saved America, so I guess I was less surprised than some of my contemporaries when I wandered out of Stat 100 this morning and saw:

NEW YORK (AP) -- Wall Street is plunging, with the Dow Jones industrials down more than 500 points amid growing fears that the credit crisis is spreading around the world.
Investors are realizing that the Bush administration's $700 billion rescue plan won't work quickly to unfreeze credit markets, and many banks are still having difficulty gaining access to cash. European governments also took steps over the weekend to limit the damage from the growing global financial crisis...
...World markets suffered massive losses Monday, striking four-year lows, as panic-stricken investors doubted whether a Wall Street bailout package would stem the global financial crisis.
London, Frankfurt and Paris all tumbled more than six percent approaching the half-way mark while a 15-percent dive in Moscow forced a halt to Russian trading...
...Investors will learn today whether the Paulson bail-out - fattened to $850bn (£480bn) by Congress - can begin to halt the death spiral in the credit system. So far, the response looks terrible.
During the past week, we have tipped over the edge, into the middle of the abyss. Systemic collapse is in full train. The Netherlands has just rushed through a second, more sweeping nationalisation of Fortis. Ireland and Greece have had to rescue all their banks. Iceland is facing an Argentine denouement.
The US commercial paper market is closed. It shrank $95bn last week, and has lost $208bn in three weeks. The interbank lending market has seized up. There are almost no bids. It is a ghost market. Healthy companies cannot roll over debt. Some will have to sack staff today to stave off default.
Good job everybody! Time for a well-deserved vacation!
I have been telling my friends for a while -- and I'm increasingly convinced myself -- that the "bailout" is wrongheaded NOT JUST because it's a humongous transfer of wealth from the public to the financial elite, but also because it misses the core of the economic problem. The "bailout" is all well and good if the banks and other institutions are jammed up because of liquidity, i.e. their assets are tied up in this bad paper that nobody wants, and if the gov't takes it all then cash can flow again. But what if the problem is not liquidity but solvency, i.e. they've been operating on imaginary money and fancy bookwork this whole time, and a lot of these institutions just fundamentally have more liabilities than assets? In that case, the "bailout" does absolutely nothing to assure anyone that the system can meet its obligations. Increasingly it seems like that's the case -- in which case, we're in much deeper trouble than Paulson, Bernanke, Bush, Congress, or anybody in power seems willing to recognize.
Here is the article that got me thinking about the solvency/liquidity issue. Also, Nouriel Roubini -- who's been completely right about this entire thing since 2006 -- has been making this argument, as have some others, for quite a while.
Next weekend I'm leaving again, this time for Canadian Thanksgiving. If past experience is any indication, Congress or the Fed will do something SUPER-AWESOME over the weekend which will undoubtedly fix the problem, at taxpayer expense (again). And on Tuesday when I return, I'm just going to assume Wall Street will have burst into flames, or something. Just how much closer to systemic collapse can we get before everything tips over -- or at very least, until somebody important recognizes the problem?
1. RECIPE TIP: next time you make meatloaf, put some FRENCH'S brand french-fried onions on top. Mmm, crispy goodness!
2. Congress' "sweeteners" couldn't possibly be as SWEET as FRENCH'S brand french-fried onions! Add that onion crunch to your salad, soup or stir-fry today!
Canadian Thanksgiving is just like American Thanksgiving, except better, because it's in October before everything freezes and you can't go outside anymore. Plus we invented it:
The history of Thanksgiving in Canada goes back to an explorer, Martin Frobisher, who had been trying to find a northern passage to the Orient. In the year 1578, he held a formal ceremony, in what is now the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, to give thanks for surviving the long journey. This feast is considered by many to be the first Thanksgiving celebration in North America, although celebrating the harvest and giving thanks for a successful bounty of crops had been a long-standing tradition throughout North America by various First Nations and Native American groups.
At the same time, French settlers, having crossed the ocean and arrived in Canada with explorer Samuel de Champlain, also held huge feasts of thanks. They even formed 'The Order of Good Cheer' and gladly shared their food with their First Nations neighbours.
After the Seven Years' War ended in 1763 handing over New France to the British, the citizens of Halifax held a special day of Thanksgiving. Thanksgiving days were observed beginning in 1799 but did not occur every year. After the American Revolution, American refugees who remained loyal to Great Britain moved from the United States and came to Canada. They brought the customs and practices of the American Thanksgiving to Canada. The first Thanksgiving Day after Canadian Confederation was observed as a civic holiday on April 5, 1872 to celebrate the recovery of the Prince of Wales (later King Edward VII) from a serious illness.
Starting in 1879 Thanksgiving Day was observed every year but the date was proclaimed annually and changed year to year. The theme of the Thanksgiving holiday also changed year to year to reflect an important event to be thankful for.
Now, when they say the "theme" was changed every year, they mean, for instance:
1799: In signal victory over our enemy and for the manifold and inestimable blessings which our Kingdoms and Provinces have received and daily continue to receive
1815: End of the war with the United States of America and restoration of the blessings of Peace
1833: Cessation of cholera
1834: End of quarantine of ships at Grosse Isle
1838: For the termination of the Rebellion
1872: For restoration to health of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales
And it does not, to my knowledge, involve french-fried onion toppings. But it should, because they're DELICIOUS.
Whatever to your facts. U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A.! But I will grudgingly concede that the return to good health of H.R.H. the Prince of Wales is certainly good cause for celebration.
What is Canadian
What is Canadian Thanksgiving, exactly? And does it involve french-fried onion toppings?