The Harvard College Democrats
(shield)
(shield)

17739
DOORS

1732
CALLS

User login

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Garrett Smacks the IOP in Today's Crimson

Posted on Mon, 12/10/2007 - 1:11am by Markus Kolic

Read read read read read:

On its face, the IOP purports to support exactly what the misty-eyed memoirists of the activist Sixties want Harvard students to be doing. In the style of the civic-minded academy, it implores Harvard students to “examine critically and think creatively about politics and public issues.” The entire circus operates under the spiritual aegis of President John F. Kennedy ’40, who, one imagines, looks down with rolled-up sleeves and a winning smile upon the IOP’s noble young activists.

Marketing, however, can’t gloss over the truth forever. What transpires down at the end of JFK Street is not the catalysis of idealism but rather a sort of cotillion for political nerds. It absorbs every freshman looking to exercise their obligations as a citizen and churns out a mixture of political technicians, professional hand-shakers, and disillusioned burnouts.

[...] the IOP inculcates a worrisome catechism of centrism in its followers. The maxim of political involvement IOP-style is to mold yourself into just the right mixture of sensible sentiments and professional suavity. Of the nineteen members of the IOP’s Student Advisory Council, for example, only four choose to identify as “liberal” or “conservative” on their Facebook profiles. Nine, apparently, have no political views whatsoever.

And having a corral for the political set on JFK street means Harvard mirrors a problem endemic to the nation: the consigning of civic duties to a self-contained class of “political people.” This flies in the face of the very notion of democratic society: that we are all political people. Political mobility is a sentiment which needs to boil through everyone who comes to Harvard College, a trade school of citizenship.

Absolutely right. Plus Garrett is much more intellectual and pragmatic about it than I can ever bring myself to be -- my solution to this problem has never grown much past "burn the motherfucker down", which for the record is also how I feel about the Crimson, the final clubs, and the GODDAMN NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS -- so you should really just go read his piece.

Though I would add that the IOP is ultimately not a cause of our political inertia so much as a symptom; there is a whole social and economic order that demands just those centrist sycophants the IOP churns out. (Let's not pretend the Dems are innocent on that front either.) After all, the all-inclusive "democratic society" Garrett proposes does not coexist well with a capitalistic one...

...For a palate cleanser, make sure also to read Jarret's fun column comparing the GOP presidential race to Charlie and the Chocolate Factory -- though I do think Jarret seriously underestimates the impact of Ron Paul. He has a blimp, people! A BLIMP! HOW CAN HE LOSE??!?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Ditto your sentiments on the

Posted on Mon, 12/10/2007 - 1:37pm by Eva Lam

Ditto your sentiments on the Pats.  I don't think there's anything that'll stop them from going 16-0 left on the schedule, which is terribly unfortunate.

I don't know, man. Look out

Posted on Mon, 12/10/2007 - 1:40pm by Markus Kolic

I don't know, man. Look out for those Miami Dolphins. That's a juggernaut waiting to happen...

Comeback!  Comeback!

Posted on Tue, 12/11/2007 - 1:11am by Eva Lam

Comeback!  Comeback!  Comeback!

"Cotillion for political

Posted on Mon, 12/10/2007 - 4:52pm by Anthony Dedousis (not verified)


"Cotillion for political nerds?"  Stone cold, Garrett Dash.  Say what you will about the IOP, but in three months of being at Harvard, it has given me the chance to see and speak to two Nobel laureates (F.W. de Klerk and Mikhail Gorbachev), one presidential candidate (Michael Dukakis), and a senior White House official (Andy Card).  How many college freshman can say that?
 
And as for the Pats, I'm going to go out on a limb, and suggest that my hometown New York Giants will spoil the Pats' attempt at perfection in Week 17.

The Giants will destroy the

Posted on Mon, 12/10/2007 - 11:06pm by Jarret Zafran

The Giants will destroy the Pats.  As for the IOP, I largely agree with Garrett's op-ed, but in many ways it is a reflection of a more narrow focus of theirs coupled with a sizable contingent of people just looking to suckle at the teat of power.

I've loved my time spent there because I felt like I've learned a lot from some of the guests, more than I can in class.  But ultimately it is a place for consumers and not producers and with the exception of a few committees like Survey, Civics, and Citizenship, much of the work is done for students by the staff members.  In that way, the students who focus on the IOP alone miss a lot.  The IOP should do a better job at supporting (with money and energy) other student groups - ahem - who enhance their mission of inspiring youth to engage in public service.

My favorite part of the IOP has always been the forum events, and the drawing power of the IOP is undeniable.  Whether it was Muhammad Yunus, John Kerry, Stephen Colbert, or General Abizaid, I've enjoyed the ability to ask tough burning questions to many people affecting the world we live in.

I've also gotten the chance to get to know Senator Bob Graham (one of my all-time favorite people) among others.

Is it insular?  Yes.  Does it breed douchebaggery? Sometimes.  But does it serve a function on campus?  Undoubtedly.

Update on the blimp: Russ

Posted on Tue, 12/11/2007 - 11:24am by Eva Lam

Update on the blimp: Russ Feingold might personally shoot it down. Or McCain. I guess he has a more vested interest.